Corrections Policy
unCrazed will always produce, distribute and make available to the public mistakes that happen. Human error can be overlooked by many, and fortunately for us our brand primarily distributes content on digital platforms meaning it can be easily edited for the purposes of prompt updates and even corrections.
Due to this ability, it can also hold a negative connotation — and rightly so. We promise our readers that any mistakes that happen are cleared up as quickly and accurately as humanly possible abiding to our Fact Checking Policy. As a layer of security to readers and those skeptical that mistakes could be covered up amid the misinformation era, any mistakes, minus spellings/grammatical errors where deemed necessary by our journalists, will be highlighted appropriately with either an updated version of the article originally posted, or a new story addressing the mistake.
Other Corrections Policies
- When an error is found by a reader and posted to the comment stream, the audience engagement team should indicate in comments that it has been corrected.
- If we have sent out incorrect information in an alert, we should send out an alert informing people that the news reported in the earlier alert was wrong and give readers the accurate information.
- When we publish erroneous information on social networks, we should correct it on that platform.
- We do not attribute blame to individual reporters or editors (e.g. “because of a reporting error” or “because of an editing error”). But we may note that an error was the result of a production problem or because incorrect information came to us from a trusted source (wire services, individuals quoted, etc.)
Take-down (unpublish) requests
Because of the ease with which our published content can be searched and retrieved online, even years after publication, we are increasingly being asked to take down (or “unpublish”) articles from our website.
As a matter of editorial policy, we do not grant take-down requests, which should be vetted at the highest level. If the subject claims that the story was inaccurate, we should be prepared to investigate and, if necessary, publish a correction. And there may be situations in which fairness demands an update or follow-up coverage — for example, if we reported that a person was charged with a crime but did not report that the charges were later dismissed for lack of evidence. In short, our response will be to consider whether further editorial action is warranted, but not to remove the article as though it had never been published. When we publish publicly available personal data, we only will review takedown requests if the person involved is under threat of physical harm because of the existence of the material.
